Risk taxonomy
Material Risk Identification and Risk Universe Design
Create a disciplined approach to identifying all material risks, including those not fully captured under Pillar 1.
Author: Editorial DeskPublished: 10 February 2026
Start with the full risk universe
The materiality framework should begin with an expansive risk universe rather than a narrow list of currently modelled risks. That creates space to consider concentration risk, residual risk, strategic risk, pension risk, reputational impacts, and emerging risk themes.
Build explicit inclusion logic
For each risk category, the institution should record:
- a description of the risk
- the transmission channel to earnings, capital, liquidity, or franchise value
- whether the risk is material
- how it is measured or otherwise assessed
- who owns the methodology and evidence
Keep it connected to governance
Risk identification is not a static library exercise. It should connect to risk appetite discussions, committee papers, and annual review triggers so the taxonomy evolves when the business model changes.
Reading map
Risk taxonomy
Illustrative mapping
Blind spots
Review cadence
Ownership model
Link to RAS